Believing in god a critical view on pascals wager
What do you think about pascal's wager how would you critique. A critical look at pascal's wager, the argument that belief in god is rational whether or not there is evidence for god's existence, because it is in our interests to believe. Wagering belief: examining two objections to pascal's wager pascal's wager has been the subject of protracted philosophical interest since its posthumous appearance. Another objection to pascal's wager is that god will grant eternal life solely on belief or, in other words, either you believe and you are saved or you don't and. Pascal's wager this essay pascal's nevertheless, even if the metaphysical argument fails, we can still ask if it is better to believe in god than not to do so. How to refute pascal's wager pascal's wager has been one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of religious belief many theists have used it, to their knowledge or not however it's far from impeccable consequently it can be.
Pascal's wager offers no evidence for god's existence -- not even the shaky evidence of the appearance of design or the supposed fine-tuning of the universe or the feelings in your heart it offers no logical argument for why god must exist or probably exists -- not even the paper-thin logic of the first cause argument it does not offer one scrap of. The argument from pascal's wager most philosophers think pascal's wager is the weakest of all arguments for believing in the existence of god. Pascal’s wager in the final analysis pascal’s wager is usually presented by believers as a reason that atheists should believe in god it is quite clear why believers would think this, because they already accept a series of unstated assumptions upon which the wager is based however, as i have shown above, the wager is absolutely useless to. The famous “pascal’s wager” asks us to consider the question of the existence of god as a wager which is the better bet—belief or disbelief. One of the more famous uses of game theory to support one decision over another in everyday life is pascal’s wager this is a decision that physicist blaise pascal made, in the mid-1600’s, determining that given the choice between believing in god and not, believing is the better option every. Review opinions on the online debate pascals wager is a valid argument for believing in god.
Pascal's wager was originally put forth by blaise pascal, a 17 th century philosopher and mathematician according to the wager, god may or may not exist if god does exist and you choose to believe in god, then your reward is very high (eternal life in heaven)however, if you do not believe in god, your penalty is very high (eternal. Talk:pascal's wager from rationalwiki jump to: navigation the probabilties for believing in various gods are critical here as it stands, the formulation of.
@bob some interpretations of the wager argue that it could be suggested that believing in a generic god, or a god by the wrong name, is acceptable so long as that conception of god has similar characteristics of the conception. Arguments for and against the existence of god using pascal's wager, aristotelian logic, critical thinking and some good old common sense. Pascal's wager: a thorough examination of the wager and its objections from the point of view of probability and decision theory jd williams, the compleat startegyst: being a primer on the theory of games of startegy, mcgraw-hill, 1954. The argument that it’s better to believe in god just in case is commonly known as pascal’s wager, named after the 17th century french philosopher blaise pascal he proposed it’s safer to believe in god (he spoke of the christian god at the time) because the pros outweigh the cons.
The final misrepresentation on the part of those refuting pascal is that pascal’s wager is the only reason for believing in god pascal certainly never said nor is it true there are many reasons for believing in god, pascal’s wager is a logical argument for belief in god but far from the only one. This week on the philosopher's zone we're wagering on god well, why not what have we got to lose if god doesn't exist, we lose nothing if he does, we gain everything this is the famous argument known as 'pascal's wager' after the great seventeenth-century french philosopher blaise pascal. In this wireless philosophy video, susanna rinard (harvard university) explains pascal's wager, blaise pascal's famous argument for belief in god lifting an approach from the. Essay on pascal’s wager 984 words 4 pages in this paper i will be discussing pascal’s wager what i first plan to do in this paper is explain the argument of pascal’s wager next i will explain how pascal tries to convince non-theists why they should believe in god i will then explain two criticisms in response to pascal’s argument finally, i will.
Believing in god a critical view on pascals wager
Blaise pascal was a philosopher and mathematician in the 17th century pascal's wager, in a nutshell, is this: no one knows for certain whether god exists maybe he does, maybe he doesn't it's a gamble whether you believe in him or not so let's treat it like a gamble, says pascal, and look at. Matters of faith, religious beliefs - pascal's wager: to believe or not to believe in god.
Philosophy 102: introduction to philosophical inquiry pascal's wager abstract: since pascal does not think a sound argument can be given for god's existence, he proposes a persuasive consideration. This argument critiques pascal's wager on the basis that there is no reason to limit the choices to the christian god since there have been many religions throughout human history, there can be many potential gods another critique comes from atheist circles richard dawkins postulated the possibility of a god that might reward honest disbelief. “pascal’s wager as an argument for not believing in god”, religious studies, 19: 57–64 –––, 1990 atheism: a philosophical justification, philadelphia: temple university press. Read no dice on the wager: a critical discussion of pascal’s god argument free essay and over 88,000 other research documents no dice on the wager: a critical discussion of pascal’s god argument in the gambling world bets are made based on odds, the probability or likelihood that something would happen in. Pascal’s wager vs the ontological argument pascal’s wager was a groundbreaking theory posed by the french philosopher, mathematician, and physicist blaise pascal.
Pascal's wager: pascal’s wager, practical argument for belief in god formulated by blaise pascal in his pensées (1657–58), pascal posed the following argument to show that belief in the christian religion is rational: if the christian god does not exist, the agnostic loses little by believing in him and gains. Title length color rating : pascal’s wager essay - in this paper i will be discussing pascal’s wager what i first plan to do in this paper is explain the argument of pascal’s wager next i will explain how pascal tries to convince non-theists why they should believe in god. What fallacy in pascal's wager allows replacing god with the devil and rewards atheists for not believing in him for pascal's wager to really hold up logically. Unlike pascal's famous wager, on the jamesian wager the benefits of belief in god are realized even if god exists turns out to be false turning to the evidence from social science, jordan concludes that believing in god is probably better for the individual than not believing with regard to happiness and mortality, and moreover that disbelief does.